The Good, the Bad and Good Social Issues to Discuss

The Good, the Bad and Good Social Issues to Discuss What You Don't Know About Good Social Issues to Discuss Writing an intriguing essay about trendy topics is an opportunity to reveal your understanding of earth. Creating commandants as opposed to empathetic conversationalists. Once you've got a concept of what you would like to write about, be sure that your topic is neither broad nor narrow. In case the topic is too narrow, you might find it difficult to get the appropriate literature. In order to have an intriguing debate, you first have to get an intriguing debate topic. Debate topics generally are supposed to hold to attention of listeners, and we have some which are guaranteed to hold anybody's interest! The 5-Minute Rule for Good Social Issues to Discuss The series was made to provide prospective investors the basic tools they will need to be successful. Before you can be certain that you need to put money into real estate, you've got to understand why you shouldn't. You still have to deal with the management company. Choosing a management company is not going to make each one of your problems go away. Next you'll need to determine if you wish to outsource product development to an agency or freelancer, or in case you wish to construct your app in-house. Social entrepreneurs combine the ability of business with a mission to deal with global social problems. You have to be able to locate a plethora of reliable professionals and contractors to perform tasks which you are unable to do. There are natural businesses that we ought to expand to. The Good, the Bad and Good Social Issues to Discuss You'll get caught up eventually. This often requires the shape of volunteering. There is a particular fragility of revenue and social position in France. Commitment of sponsors to the CAC might be a crucial element in deciding the effectiveness of the CAC. You select the time horizon, 10 decades out, 20 decades out, 30 decades out. Issues of right and wrong come up in classrooms all of the time, and it can be difficult to understand how to address them. I am highly motivated to be successful. The Good Social Issues to Discuss Pitfall Among the likely first tasks of any advisory group is going to be to assess the demands and concerns of the community. Upon graduation, a couple of years of supervised work is essential to acquire licensure. Don't be worried if you don't have good writing skills because you need to always seek the services of an expert to finish your assignment punctually. Professional writing service will solve difficulties with homework at any level with no delays. You might have to earn a decision based on trust. A family therapist, Paul Hokemeyer, says that the mind develops until age twenty-two, and this is an essential period of time to create social skills so as to be a healthful and happy adult. Being a social worker demands extensive understanding of human behavior and development, in addition to social, cultural, and financial institutions and the ways they interact. With total blindness, Allie made a decision to proceed. Good social ties of all sorts strengthen our capacity to be emotionally resilient and maintain physical wellbeing. It will provide you with a deep grasp of the problem you're attempting to address. There are an assortment of methods people use to combat social troubles. It is going to also make it rather hard to foresee any issues with your choice later on, once you might need to scale. Finding the Best Good Social Issues to Discuss It simply lists a succession of complaints. There really is not any way to begin in real estate with a little buy in like $2,000. After the toilet isn't working it should be fixed now. It's possible for you to highlight the strategies they use, including connecting with family and talking about what's going on with friends. If only a few individuals are speaking out against it, then it's not a social matter. They can feel lonely if they lack meaningful relationships, despite the company of others.

What Should Your Topic Sentences Be in a 5-Paragraph Essay?

What Should Your Topic Sentences Be in a 5-Paragraph Essay?What should your topic sentences be in a 5 paragraph essay? Well, they should be related to the topic of the essay. It is possible to use almost any type of sentence structure in this case and to turn it into a topic. It just depends on your target audience.If you are writing a personal essay on yourself, then you have two choices. You can use the introduction to go into your personality and what do you like best about yourself. Or, you can make a section of the essay about something that you do like, or write about a past event that caused you to change your personality.If you are writing a book then the key ideas and points that you want to get across will be directly related to the information in the text. Then all you have to do is arrange them in the proper sequence. Use a 3-paragraph essay structure. These three paragraphs will basically be the one with your main idea, a short summary of your research, and your conclusi on.The second type of topic in an essay that you should consider is what the person that you are writing for is interested in. If they are writing for their children then you will need to put the subject matter into perspective for them and let them know what will interest them. If you want to make sure that they enjoy what you are saying, you should think of ways to create interesting stories or pictures and descriptions. You will need to make sure that the students remember what you said, and at the same time, they will need to be excited about the topics that you are discussing.Even if you are doing a focused group with adults and you want to take a stab at writing a 5 paragraph essay, it does not mean that you cannot build a number of facts into a paragraph. This is especially true if you are using a three-paragraph essay structure. All you have to do is read and re-read your paragraphs and try to integrate them with one another.If you are writing a sentence in an essay that is a science paper then you should not use only one topic per paragraph. In fact, the most important thing that you can do in a science paper is to use a topic for each paragraph. It will keep the people's attention for as long as you have and it will also give them something to talk about after they read the entire essay.However, if you are doing a sentence in an essay that is an exam then you should definitely use the same sentence structure as you would use when you were trying to get a good grade. You can even mix up the topic sentences for the exam as well. Try doing a sentence in an essay that is not a writing assignment and then re-do it for the exam.Remember that the best way to become an expert in the topic of your essay is to continue to write essays about the subject as you continue to learn about it. You will find that once you start writing and producing work on a regular basis, you will find that you are capable of producing even better writing as well. The only thing tha t you have to do is to stay focused on your topic and keep writing.

Organic Research Paper Topics - Do You Have Any Ideas?

Organic Research Paper Topics - Do You Have Any Ideas?What about researching organic research paper topics? Here is how I put together a list of possible topics for you to think about. By the way, these are just my thoughts and not any type of endorsements. If you have any great ideas or other suggestions on topics for you to research, then by all means let me know!As you might have guessed by now, I am talking about something that has something to do with 'the environment.' I could spend hours researching the scientific research on what exactly 'the environment' means, but I think it would take more than two days.Still, I think this is a great topic to research. Just because I have been researching environmental issues and pollution for so long, I now believe that we have a responsibility to protect the planet. And as a scientist, that would include protecting the world's natural resources.Of course, there are also problems with deforestation and overfishing which are important to n ote. And while there may be an alternative to using pesticides and fertilizers, it is still important to find out if we really can use these methods to save the environment.Other research paper topics that may seem a little bit less serious may include things like genetic engineering and biotech research. There are some very interesting areas of science that are related to this topic and some of them involve growing organs, breeding plants and animals and finding cures for deadly diseases.In fact, one of the best news stories of the year is all about some new developments in biotechnology that could help us grow new organs and potentially cure cancer. I suppose this is also one of the reasons why I decided to start researching research paper topics related to this topic.So, those are my thoughts and I would love to hear yours, so please feel free to comment! So, you have probably already put together your own list of research paper topics related to organic research.

Massachusetts School of Law Essay Test Sample

Massachusetts School of Law Essay Test SampleA Massachusetts school of law essay test sample is required for all candidates who want to pursue legal studies in this state. It will provide a fair idea about what to expect when taking this kind of exam. Although most colleges and universities will offer such kind of education program, they are not generally accredited in Massachusetts.However, the state has taken several steps to improve its legal institutions. For instance, it became more independent from the United States Supreme Court and now practices its own fundamental constitutional laws. Hence, if you are interested in pursuing a career in this area, you should consider the top legal schools in Massachusetts. Here, you can find a list of the best colleges in Massachusetts for your choosing.You should find a quality legal education in this state that will give you the right knowledge on a variety of legal issues and methods of law. With the passage of time, legal education in Ma ssachusetts has undergone a great change. Now, there are even several online law schools that will teach you the methods of law and how they apply in the real world.The Massachusetts education system plays a vital role in a person's career. It can help you obtain an excellent degree in law and help you become a highly sought after professional. It is thus important that you choose the best college in Massachusetts for your legal studies.Nowadays, there are a number of legal colleges that offer a comprehensive program in a state like Massachusetts. You can choose a law school that suits your educational needs. The Massachusetts colleges that you can choose from include Massachusetts College of Law, Boston University School of Law, and School of Social Work.You can find a complete list of the universities on various online sites. These schools provide convenient access to their information and services.If you are looking for the best law schools in Massachusetts, you should go through the online listing. All these Boston-based universities provide one-on-one services to their applicants. They are available at any point of time to answer your queries and concerns.

Strengths And Weaknesses Of Treaty Of Versailles free essay sample

Germany resentfully signed the most famous treaty ever, Versailles. Although years of readjusting the treaty followed, this essay will focus mainly on the strengths and weaknesses of the 440 articles in 1919. The Treaty followed a massive war, with huge human sacrifice. It was supposed to be the Treaty to end all wars and give security to the countries involved. The overwhelming task that laid ahead for Woodrow Wilson (America), Lloyd George (Great Britain), Clemenceau (France) and Orlando (Italy) was on a bigger scale than any previous delegates had had to deal with. One of the biggest interpreted weaknesses was the economics and reparations. Firstly, it highlighted the weaknesses of the delegates forming the Treaty, as they had to listen to public demand which had been exaggerated due to the scale and length of the war. An example was Lloyd George who was pressured from conservatives for harsh reparations, Geddes, a conservative politician hailed the words ‘we shall squeeze the German lemon until the pips squeak. We will write a custom essay sample on Strengths And Weaknesses Of Treaty Of Versailles or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Packer declared Lloyd George did not believe in harsh reparations [2] , but George added extras to the original reparations such as war pensions to please the conservatives because the original amount based on war damage gave Britain a very little. Kitchen showed and I agree that there was little Lloyd George could do about the situation as ‘no politician would have survived if he had suggested that Germany should be forgiven. ’ [3] However, Lentin disagreed, thinking that public opinion created pressure but had no impact on the Treaty. He later contradicted himself by proclaiming that the one of the causes of the delay in announcing reparations because the delegates believed that the public would never be satisfied with the guaranteed amount. [4] Therefore, public opinion had to be acknowledged and satisfied to a certain extent. This meant the Treaty did not always accomplish what was needed such as lower reparations. The biggest weakness with the reparations was the total amount (? 600 million) Germany had to pay. Keynes, who scathingly criticised the Treaty of Versailles, heavily condemned the reparations as Britain depended on the revival of trade, especially with Germany, [5] but Germany needed to increase their exports and decrease their imports. This would decrease trade with Britain and lose Britain money. Feldman, although I disagree, supported Keynes believing that the economic and financial settlements were ‘horrendous failures. ’ [6] This was an extreme view and seemed to ignore the circumstances the delegates were dealing with. There were poor decisions but Feldman over-exaggerated. Nicolson argued that it was not excessively harsh economically to Germany. [7] However, although it was not excessively harsh, I believe it was too harsh for Germany to even begin to comprehend, especially when territory and economics are combined. Germany lost 13. 5% of their territory including 8% of German coal production. Germany lost 10% of her population as well as 1. 7 million people in the war. Population creates manpower for industry. This might not seem a lot however, when you add ? This shows another weakness of the Versailles Treaty, as no suitable amount for Germany to pay was reached discrediting the treaty. However it could be deemed an unavoidable weakness as the reparations were decreased in the 1920s but the Germans still felt it was unfair. Another weakness of the Treaty of Versailles was the disarmament hypocrisy. The League of Nation’s articles asserted that any discrepancies would be sorted through the League and not by war. Therefore there was no need for any country to have large armies; however Germany was forced to disarm to a 200,000 volunteer army, showing how the points were used selectively. During the revisionist period Germany complained about the unjust nature of disarmament. Therefore disarmament can be viewed as a weakness as it highlights the unjust part of the Treaty but it shows that Germany was always going to come back with revenge. Germany was unified in its pride in its military. Carr argued that Germany’s rise in 1920s was inevitable as ‘it was unreasonable to impose a position of permanent inferiority on a great power. This was true, but unavoidable; France wanted to know that Germany could not attack them. However, if the hypocrisy previously mentioned did not exist, and everyone had disarmed, then the situation could have been different. Isolating Germany in disarmament and the League of Nations was a bad idea, as they used it as an excuse to break the Treaty later, which was one of the causes of the Second World War. The Treaty had the aim of prolonged peace, and the isolation through disarmament was one of the reasons it did not fulfil its aim. The failure of the League of Nations was a huge weakness; it failed because America, Russia and Germany were omitted. The League could not make decisions about the world without three of the most influential countries. The League was bypassed when Italy seized Corfu, causing embarrassment for the League as it showed a lack of power. The League might not have been certain to succeed, but if the League had put its countries beliefs behind, and the worldwide affairs first, it would not be deemed such a weakness. The League of Nations had strengths too, it was the first time the idea have been put into practise trying some ideologically and practically new to keep the peace worldwide. The League introduced medical measures that had not been in states before 1914. This was a very credible strength from the Treaty of Versailles. It really was evidence of the Versailles Treaty trying to keep prolonged peace. The compromises in the Treaty created strengths and weaknesses. These compromises had left historians to debate as to whether the Treaty would have been stronger if it had been harsher or softer. Marks perfectly described the Treaty as ‘too soft to restrain Germany†¦ yet too severe to be acceptable to Germans. ’ [9] It was viewed too harsh in terms of reparations, disarmament and territory. The consequence of this was Germany convincing others it was too harsh bringing the revisionism viewpoint of the 1920s which had been adopted by Britain. Revisionism allowed the Germans to undo some of the Treaty’s main clauses such as self-determination, reparations and disarmament. Revisionism has been linked to the rise of Nazism and also the Second World War. The Versailles Treaty aimed to keep prolonged peace, the weakness of the compromise shows a failure of the Treaty. A soft treaty would have been impossible, the after war feeling was to enforce a vindictive peace to help restore some of the hurt caused during the war that Germany was blamed for starting. However , it seemed that no matter how soft the Treaty would have been Germany would have wanted to change it. I agree with Kitchen that ‘ultimately no amount of revision would have satisfied the Germans. ’ [10] The strength of the Versailles Treaty compromises was that most of the clauses were very just, especially considering the circumstances. An example of this would be the Rhineland, France wanted to occupy it, however the other delegates knew that it would only cause outrage in Germany, and would strike revenge, therefore they created a compromise where the Rhineland would remain unoccupied and demilitarized. Another way to view the compromises as strength is looking at Germany’s Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, an obviously overly harsh Treaty imposed on Russia after they withdrew from the war. This strength does not disregard mistakes in the compromises and in the Treaty; however it highlights that within the circumstances it was a commendable agreement. However, the strengths and weaknesses could be argued to be unavoidable. The Treaty regardless of its content was never going to last. Mattrl pointed out the undeniable point that ‘before the ink had dried on the Treaty of Versailles, the movement to destroy it†¦had begun. ’ [11] Therefore the weaknesses mentioned would not have been weaknesses had German accepted losing the war and the terms. The Treaty would not have been so heavily criticised and littered with failures if it had been enforced. The Treaty could have been successful but once the Treaty had been signed; the alliance had crumbled, worsened by different ideas on how to enforce the Treaty. France wanted to make sure the clauses were imposed on Germany as harsh as possible; however Britain began to revise the Treaty. Germany complained about the Treaty, believing it was unjust, when in reality it was mainly fair. For example, if disarmament had been enforced, Germany would not have been able to annex Czechoslovakia, which was a cause of the Second World War. Germany was also left to decide about whether they could afford the reparations, and obviously, as they did not want to have this article imposed on them, they often escaped doing it, to a standard that could easily create weaknesses in the Versailles Treaty. Marks correctly explained that the delegates ‘erroneously believed that Germany would abide by their decisions,’ [12] this highlighted one of the many reasons why enforcement of the Treaty failed. Another reason for the lack of enforcement was that the allies were not loyal to each other; they just won the same war that they fought for different reasons. Therefore, the Treaty could be argued to have exposed weaknesses due to the lack of enforcement as opposed to the original articles. It can be argued that there are less strengths than weaknesses in the Treaty of Versailles but it is often forgotten that the biggest strength is far more significant than most of the weaknesses. The momentous task that lied ahead of the delegates was incomprehensible; 10 million people lost their lives alongside the new style of warfare. The war came to an abrupt end and there were complex issues alongside contradicting viewpoints. The short amount of time they had, and the amount they had to handle creates the strength as they were able to form a Treaty which although has been criticised with many weaknesses, also has commendable articles and decisions. It must never be forgotten that the Treaty was produced attempting long-term peace whilst punishing the losers of the war, as most Treaties do. If the Treaty had been accepted by the Germans, it could have been an established peace settlement. In conclusion, there are many strengths and weaknesses of the Treaty of Versailles, from the ideological revolution in the League of Nations, to the lack of considered economics in the reparations and loss of territories. However, the Treaty should be commended as one of its own time, that regardless of its contents would have been changed and adjusted as no Treaty had ever involved so many world and European powers. Marks convincingly summed up the Treaty by rightly claiming that the Treaty was a product of its time representing the feelings of the time; therefore its duration was limited seeing as the reality of the feelings of 1919 was limited. Strengths And Weaknesses Of Treaty Of Versailles free essay sample Germany resentfully signed the most famous treaty ever, Versailles. Although years of readjusting the treaty followed, this essay will focus mainly on the strengths and weaknesses of the 440 articles in 1919. The Treaty followed a massive war, with huge human sacrifice. It was supposed to be the Treaty to end all wars and give security to the countries involved. The overwhelming task that laid ahead for Woodrow Wilson (America), Lloyd George (Great Britain), Clemenceau (France) and Orlando (Italy) was on a bigger scale than any previous delegates had had to deal with. One of the biggest interpreted weaknesses was the economics and reparations. Firstly, it highlighted the weaknesses of the delegates forming the Treaty, as they had to listen to public demand which had been exaggerated due to the scale and length of the war. An example was Lloyd George who was pressured from conservatives for harsh reparations, Geddes, a conservative politician hailed the words ‘we shall squeeze the German lemon until the pips squeak. We will write a custom essay sample on Strengths And Weaknesses Of Treaty Of Versailles or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page [1] Packer declared Lloyd George did not believe in harsh reparations [2] , but George added extras to the original reparations such as war pensions to please the conservatives because the original amount based on war damage gave Britain a very little. Kitchen showed and I agree that there was little Lloyd George could do about the situation as ‘no politician would have survived if he had suggested that Germany should be forgiven. ’ [3] However, Lentin disagreed, thinking that public opinion created pressure but had no impact on the Treaty. He later contradicted himself by proclaiming that the one of the causes of the delay in announcing reparations because the delegates believed that the public would never be satisfied with the guaranteed amount. [4] Therefore, public opinion had to be acknowledged and satisfied to a certain extent. This meant the Treaty did not always accomplish what was needed such as lower reparations. The biggest weakness with the reparations was the total amount (? 600 million) Germany had to pay. Keynes, who scathingly criticised the Treaty of Versailles, heavily condemned the reparations as Britain depended on the revival of trade, especially with Germany, [5] but Germany needed to increase their exports and decrease their imports. This would decrease trade with Britain and lose Britain money. Feldman, although I disagree, supported Keynes believing that the economic and financial settlements were ‘horrendous failures. ’ [6] This was an extreme view and seemed to ignore the circumstances the delegates were dealing with. There were poor decisions but Feldman over-exaggerated. Nicolson argued that it was not excessively harsh economically to Germany. [7] However, although it was not excessively harsh, I believe it was too harsh for Germany to even begin to comprehend, especially when territory and economics are combined. Germany lost 13. 5% of their territory including 8% of German coal production. Germany lost 10% of her population as well as 1. 7 million people in the war. Population creates manpower for industry. This might not seem a lot however, when you add ? 00 million in reparations, the loss can seem great and perhaps the Treaty harsh. This shows another weakness of the Versailles Treaty, as no suitable amount for Germany to pay was reached discrediting the treaty. However it could be deemed an unavoidable weakness as the reparations were decreased in the 1920s but the Germans still felt it was unfair. Another weakness of the Treaty of Versailles was the disarmament hypocrisy. The League of Nation’s articles asserted that any discrepancies would be sorted through the League and not by war. Therefore there was no need for any country to have large armies; however Germany was forced to disarm to a 200,000 volunteer army, showing how the points were used selectively. During the revisionist period Germany complained about the unjust nature of disarmament. Therefore disarmament can be viewed as a weakness as it highlights the unjust part of the Treaty but it shows that Germany was always going to come back with revenge. Germany was unified in its pride in its military. Carr argued that Germany’s rise in 1920s was inevitable as ‘it was unreasonable to impose a position of permanent inferiority on a great power. [8] This was true, but unavoidable; France wanted to know that Germany could not attack them. However, if the hypocrisy previously mentioned did not exist, and everyone had disarmed, then the situation could have been different. Isolating Germany in disarmament and the League of Nations was a bad idea, as they used it as an excuse to break the Treaty later, which was one of the causes of the Second World War. The Treaty had the aim of prolonged peace, and the isolation through disarmament was one of the reasons it did not fulfil its aim. The failure of the League of Nations was a huge weakness; it failed because America, Russia and Germany were omitted. The League could not make decisions about the world without three of the most influential countries. The League was bypassed when Italy seized Corfu, causing embarrassment for the League as it showed a lack of power. The League might not have been certain to succeed, but if the League had put its countries beliefs behind, and the worldwide affairs first, it would not be deemed such a weakness. The League of Nations had strengths too, it was the first time the idea have been put into practise trying some ideologically and practically new to keep the peace worldwide. The League introduced medical measures that had not been in states before 1914. This was a very credible strength from the Treaty of Versailles. It really was evidence of the Versailles Treaty trying to keep prolonged peace. The compromises in the Treaty created strengths and weaknesses. These compromises had left historians to debate as to whether the Treaty would have been stronger if it had been harsher or softer. Marks perfectly described the Treaty as ‘too soft to restrain Germany†¦ yet too severe to be acceptable to Germans. ’ [9] It was viewed too harsh in terms of reparations, disarmament and territory. The consequence of this was Germany convincing others it was too harsh bringing the revisionism viewpoint of the 1920s which had been adopted by Britain. Revisionism allowed the Germans to undo some of the Treaty’s main clauses such as self-determination, reparations and disarmament. Revisionism has been linked to the rise of Nazism and also the Second World War. The Versailles Treaty aimed to keep prolonged peace, the weakness of the compromise shows a failure of the Treaty. A soft treaty would have been impossible, the after war feeling was to enforce a vindictive peace to help restore some of the hurt caused during the war that Germany was blamed for starting. However , it seemed that no matter how soft the Treaty would have been Germany would have wanted to change it. I agree with Kitchen that ‘ultimately no amount of revision would have satisfied the Germans. ’ The strength of the Versailles Treaty compromises was that most of the clauses were very just, especially considering the circumstances. An example of this would be the Rhineland, France wanted to occupy it, however the other delegates knew that it would only cause outrage in Germany, and would strike revenge, therefore they created a compromise where the Rhineland would remain unoccupied and demilitarized. Another way to view the compromises as strength is looking at Germany’s Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, an obviously overly harsh Treaty imposed on Russia after they withdrew from the war. This strength does not disregard mistakes in the compromises and in the Treaty; however it highlights that within the circumstances it was a commendable agreement. However, the strengths and weaknesses could be argued to be unavoidable. The Treaty regardless of its content was never going to last. Mattrl pointed out the undeniable point that ‘before the ink had dried on the Treaty of Versailles, the movement to destroy it†¦had begun. ’ [11] Therefore the weaknesses mentioned would not have been weaknesses had German accepted losing the war and the terms. The Treaty would not have been so heavily criticised and littered with failures if it had been enforced. The Treaty could have been successful but once the Treaty had been signed; the alliance had crumbled, worsened by different ideas on how to enforce the Treaty. France wanted to make sure the clauses were imposed on Germany as harsh as possible; however Britain began to revise the Treaty. Germany complained about the Treaty, believing it was unjust, when in reality it was mainly fair. For example, if disarmament had been enforced, Germany would not have been able to annex Czechoslovakia, which was a cause of the Second World War. Germany was also left to decide about whether they could afford the reparations, and obviously, as they did not want to have this article imposed on them, they often escaped doing it, to a standard that could easily create weaknesses in the Versailles Treaty. Marks correctly explained that the delegates ‘erroneously believed that Germany would abide by their decisions,’ [12] this highlighted one of the many reasons why enforcement of the Treaty failed. Another reason for the lack of enforcement was that the allies were not loyal to each other; they just won the same war that they fought for different reasons. Therefore, the Treaty could be argued to have exposed weaknesses due to the lack of enforcement as opposed to the original articles. It can be argued that there are less strengths than weaknesses in the Treaty of Versailles but it is often forgotten that the biggest strength is far more significant than most of the weaknesses. The momentous task that lied ahead of the delegates was incomprehensible; 10 million people lost their lives alongside the new style of warfare. The war came to an abrupt end and there were complex issues alongside contradicting viewpoints. The short amount of time they had, and the amount they had to handle creates the strength as they were able to form a Treaty which although has been criticised with many weaknesses, also has commendable articles and decisions. It must never be forgotten that the Treaty was produced attempting long-term peace whilst punishing the losers of the war, as most Treaties do. If the Treaty had been accepted by the Germans, it could have been an established peace settlement. In conclusion, there are many strengths and weaknesses of the Treaty of Versailles, from the ideological revolution in the League of Nations, to the lack of considered economics in the reparations and loss of territories. However, the Treaty should be commended as one of its own time, that regardless of its contents would have been changed and adjusted as no Treaty had ever involved so many world and European powers. Marks convincingly summed up the Treaty by rightly claiming that the Treaty was a product of its time representing the feelings of the time; therefore its duration was limited seeing as the reality of the feelings of 1919 was limited.